DINH DOONG

In a shocking turn of events, basketball superstar LeBron James was reportedly asked to step away from the U.S. national team roster after his very public endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris. James, who recently posted a video on X urging his followers to vote for Harris while condemning former President Donald Trump’s rhetoric, has found himself at the center of a political storm that spilled onto the court. According to sources close to the team, officials were “deeply uncomfortable” with James’s outspoken political views, particularly so close to Election Day.

“We’re here to represent America on the global stage,” said one team official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “When one of our athletes publicly takes a political side, it distracts from that mission. It’s unfortunate, but we don’t support his politics.” The statement left fans and players alike wondering if the national team is taking a stand on politics—or just against LeBron’s version of it.

The trouble began when James posted a video montage on X, showing clips of Trump’s controversial comments over the years. From warnings that the country would turn into “another Detroit” if Harris were elected to remarks about immigrants “poisoning the blood of our country,” the video pulled no punches. James’s post made it clear where he stood, concluding with the words, “When I think about my kids and my family and how they will grow up, the choice is clear to me. VOTE KAMALA HARRIS!!!”

While many fans applauded James’s courage, calling him “a voice for reason” and “a role model for today’s youth,” others—particularly those with strong political opinions—were less than thrilled. Criticism poured in from some fans who argued that sports should remain separate from politics, and within hours, #BoycottLeBron began trending. The tension soon reached the national team, where officials quickly determined that James’s vocal endorsement was incompatible with their “neutral stance” in these polarized times.

LeBron’s sudden ouster from the national team has left many scratching their heads. After all, the U.S. team has not exactly shied away from controversy or politics over the years, with players regularly taking public stands on social justice, equality, and more. Some critics argue that the decision reeks of hypocrisy, wondering if James’s pro-Harris endorsement is really the issue—or if his unapologetic criticism of Trump is what crossed the line.

“Look, we’re not here to send political messages,” said the anonymous official. “We’re here to compete, plain and simple. But when a player’s politics make headlines, it overshadows the reason we’re out there—to bring Americans together, not split them apart.” The irony wasn’t lost on James’s supporters, who pointed out that by removing him, the team may have caused an even bigger divide.

Many fans took to social media to voice their frustration with the team’s decision. “So LeBron can’t speak his mind?” one Twitter user wrote. “Guess freedom of speech doesn’t apply if you’re one of the best basketball players in the world.” Another commented, “When did it become unacceptable to support a candidate you believe in? LeBron deserves better.”

Ever the iconoclast, James has never shied away from speaking his mind, whether on or off the court. In a follow-up statement, he addressed the situation with characteristic candor. “I’m not here to please everyone,” James said. “If supporting the future I believe in costs me my spot on the team, then so be it. My values, my beliefs, they don’t change because of who’s watching.”

James’s comments were met with a flood of supportive messages from fans, fellow athletes, and celebrities. “It’s a sad day when an athlete gets booted for standing up for what he believes,” tweeted soccer star Megan Rapinoe, no stranger to political controversies herself. Meanwhile, actor Mark Ruffalo called the situation “a disgrace to sports and democracy,” adding, “LeBron deserves our respect for being unafraid to speak his truth.”

The controversy surrounding James’s endorsement highlights a long-standing debate about the intersection of sports and politics. Athletes have increasingly used their platforms to advocate for causes they care about, from Colin Kaepernick taking a knee to NBA players donning jerseys with social justice messages. Yet, the backlash against James suggests that not all political views are welcomed equally—especially if they diverge too sharply from certain quarters of public opinion.

The U.S. team’s insistence on “neutrality” has raised eyebrows, especially given its support for other causes in the past. Many fans are questioning what neutrality even means in today’s climate, where silence can sometimes be as political as speaking out. “I don’t know how you can say you’re neutral when you’re making an athlete leave the team for an endorsement,” said sports commentator Mike Alvarez. “This looks less like neutrality and more like selective silencing.”

Despite the controversy, James remains one of many high-profile figures rallying around Harris. Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny, and even Arnold Schwarzenegger have all thrown their support behind the vice president’s campaign, with each celebrity bringing their unique voice to Harris’s message. James’s endorsement, however, has attracted outsized attention, partly due to his role in a sport where fans have traditionally been divided on mixing athletics and politics.

James, for his part, appears unshaken by the decision. “I’ll keep supporting what I believe is right,” he wrote in a follow-up post. “My goal is to make the future better for my kids and my community. If that’s a problem, then maybe it’s time to question what ‘team’ we’re really supporting here.”

With his place on the national team in jeopardy, James’s next steps remain unclear. Will he reconsider his stance or look for alternative ways to make an impact? Some fans are hopeful he’ll stick to his convictions, viewing him as a role model for those who feel pressured to stay quiet about their beliefs.

In the meantime, the national team faces criticism for what some view as an overly reactionary move. As more and more players speak out on political issues, the question remains: where should the line be drawn? And does this decision signal a shift in how teams will handle political endorsements in the future?

One thing’s for certain: LeBron’s message isn’t fading anytime soon. With his influence, millions of fans, and a powerful platform, he continues to stand as one of the most outspoken voices in sports. Whether he’s wearing the U.S. jersey or not, his impact is undeniable.

In the end, fans and critics alike will be watching to see how both James and the team navigate this new terrain. Will the U.S. national team’s commitment to “neutrality” hold up, or will they find themselves rethinking their stance as the lines between sports and politics continue to blur? As for LeBron, he’s made his choice clear. And, as he’s proven time and again, he’s willing to stand tall, whether he’s on the court or off.

NOTE: This is SATIRE, It’s Not True.